HOME ABOUT OUR WORK Topic icon Criminal Courts Topic icon Credit and Finance Topic icon Housing Topic icon Labor and Employment Topic icon Policing Topic icon Public Benefits Topic icon Across the Field See all of our work OUR TEAM JOIN US
August 03, 2022
Policing

Virtual Teach-In on Seattle Police's Use of MDFTs

Logan Koepke, Emma Weil, and Urmila Janardan

Article

Following our comments to Seattle City Council on Seattle PD's use of mobile device forensic tools (MDFTs), we participated in a virtual teach-in with the ACLU of Washington to explain the technical capabilities of MDFTs and why we think the Council should restrict the ways that Seattle PD can use them.

Read our comments to Seattle City Council here.

Download
Upturn Authors
Emma Weil
Logan Koepke
Urmila Janardan

Related Work

Comments on Seattle Police Department's use of MDFTs

We submitted comments to Seattle City Council on their Surveillance Ordinance implementation process, explaining the technical capabilities of MDFTs and urging the Council to restrict the ways that Seattle PD can use them.

Policing
Mass Extraction

This report is the most comprehensive examination of U.S. law enforcement’s use of mobile device forensic tools. Our research shows that every American is at risk of having their phone forensically searched by law enforcement.

Policing
Amicus brief in Connecticut v. Smith

We filed an amicus brief in a case before the Connecticut State Supreme Court arguing that the Court should develop specific rules for the issuance and execution of cellphone search warrants.

Policing
Amicus Brief in United States v. Morton

In this brief, we explain how the Government’s remarkable technical assertions — that mobile device forensic tools can only extract all data off of a cellphone and cannot perform a narrower search — are incorrect.

Policing