Amicus Brief in Muslim Advocates v. Zuckerberg et. al.
Aaron Rieke and Natasha Duarte
Amicus briefTogether with other amici, we argue that Facebook is is governed by the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act (CPPA), even though it does not charge its users a cash price.
Related Work
This brief argues that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act should not criminalize violations of computer use policies, like terms of service.
Across the FieldThis amicus brief urges the Fourth Circuit to preserve critical and longstanding obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act that require consumer reporting agencies to ensure the accuracy of records used to make decisions about people’s access to housing, employment, credit, and other basic needs.
Across the FieldWe filed a legal brief arguing that Section 230 should not fully immunize Facebook’s Ad Platform from liability under California and D.C. law prohibiting discrimination. We describe how Facebook itself, independently of its advertisers, participates in the targeting and delivery of financial services ads based on gender and age.
Across the FieldWe filed a legal brief in Onuoha v. Facebook about Section 230 and Facebook’s Ad Platform.
Housing